Attachment No. 6.

February 2, 2004

Dark Spot Continues to Blot Romania's Record

Delays and Legal Obstacles Continue to Hinder the
Restoration of Church and Community Properties
to Romania's Hungarian Minority

 

The Special Committee set up to implement the Romanian church property restitution law (No. 501/2002) has ruled on a total of 277 claims out of 7,568 submitted by the March 2, 2003 deadline. Beginning their work several months past the deadline mandated by law, the number of claims approved at seven of its sessions for the four historic Hungarian churches (Roman Catholic, Reformed, Lutheran and Unitarian) totaled 181 (see chart below) of the 2,140 submitted. This brings the total number of properties approved either by government decree or through Law 501/2002 for the Hungarian churches and the minority community to 227. However, the churches have still not regained title to, or occupancy of, these properties. In an unexpected move, the Special Committee announced on June 27, 2003 that instead of issuing written decisions immediately - thereby allowing the claimants to register title to, and, where applicable, regain occupancy of their confiscated properties - it would do so within only 30 days. But it has failed to keep that promise as well: To date, it has only mailed written decisions to the rightful owners in the case of 49 properties, failing to meet its self-imposed deadlines several times. And so, the delay of justice continues for the 1.5 million-strong Hungarian minority of Romania.

Progress in processing the claims has been and continues to be impeded by (1) administrative understaffing of the Special Committee (one year after it began working, plans are to increase the staff to eight in February) and (2) obstruction from local authorities in procuring documentation proving the rightful owners' claims. As HHRF has previously noted: the Special Committee does not have the power to constrain local authorities to comply. Moreover, in the majority of Hungarian cases, local authorities have a vested interest in not providing any documentation, since they stand to be disadvantaged by the return of property currently in their possession. The overarching result has been repeatedly protracted deadlines for completing the restitution process - now an optimistic end of 2004.

  • An example of the convolutions associated with the restitution process is the case of the Roman Catholic Premonstrant Order which applied for restitution of a property in Sanmartin/Váradszentmárton, Bihor/Bihar County. The Special Committee informed the claimant that its claim was incomplete. Meanwhile, on June 17, 2003 the state privatization agency (APAPS) sold the majority shares of the S.C. SANIFARM S.A, a factory occupying the building, for 34 billion ROL to a private individual. Thus, one government agency is able to undermine another by taking advantage of the legal omission which does not prohibit such "restructuring” while a claim is being considered.
  • In an attempt to rectify one of the Law 501/2002's deficiencies, the government adopted Decree 184/2002 in December 2002 amending the Law to allow former owners of confiscated properties sold illegally after December 1989 (notably, it does not apply to properties confiscated and sold between 1945 and 1989) to reclaim their properties by way of nullifying contracts. Now a DAHR motion before the Senate, should it be adopted, the deadline for commencing lawsuits will be a six-month period thereafter.

Most importantly, HHRF has learned of a highly disturbing development: the Special Committee has classified 60 percent of the submitted claims as falling outside the jurisdiction of the Law. Accordingly, these claims will be outright rejected by the Special Committee because they were allegedly made for items not covered under the Law (such as lands, demolished buildings, properties confiscated before 1944 or church buildings themselves). Consequently, 4-4,500 claims stand to be rejected. Obviously, the fate of these claims is a vital issue which must either be addressed by the Special Committee or through new legislation in Parliament.

Fourteen years after the fall of communism, only 227 of 2,140 properties illegally confiscated from the churches between 1945-1989 have been returned on paper. Of these, full ownership and use has been established in only 13 cases (returned under five previous government decrees) including three communal properties. Only when the rightful owners finally regain title to, use of and compensation for these properties will the ongoing, major blow to religious freedom, civil society and the 1.5 million Hungarians ability to maintain community and church life be reversed.

Inventory of Properties Illegally Confiscated from
the Hungarian Historical Churches in Romania
(Prepared May 2002)

Confiscated

Property

Type

Roman Catholic Church

Hungarian Reformed Church

Unitarian Church

Evangelical-Lutheran Church

Total

Alba Iulia Arch-
diocese

Oradea/
Nagyvárad Diocese

Satu Mare/
Szatmár Diocese

Timisoara/
Temesvár
Diocese

Transyl-
vania District

Királyhá-
gómellék District

Buildings

               

Nurseries

1

6

1

1

3

6

-

-

18

Elementary Schools

173

56

18

58

354

166

38

4

864

High Schools

24

8

7

9

22

8

2

-

80

Hostels

6

2

1

3

4

1

1

1

18

Community Centers

4

4

5

3

60

14

12

-

102

Hospitals

-

2

2

1

3

-

-

-

8

Orphanages

6

-

6

-

2

1

-

-

15

Asylums

5

-

2

-

3

-

-

-

10

Places of Worship

13

9

4

2

9

5

1

-

43

Monasteries

20

7

12

8

-

-

-

-

47

Parish Houses

11

3

3

1

14

10

-

-

42

Bishop's Palace

-

1

-

-

-

-

-

-

1

Libraries

1

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

1

Admin. Buildings

10

3

4

-

9

1

1

1

25

Agricult. Buildings

-

69

-

-

-

-

-

-

69

Forrest Buildings

-

2

-

-

-

-

-

-

2

Mills

1

1

1

-

15

-

1

-

19

Apartments

250

93

79

23

130

134

36

13

743

TOTAL

525

266

145

119

628

346

92

19

2,140

Other Property

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cemeteries

9

3

1

-

1

4

-

-

18

Agric. Land (hectares)

-

2,663.71

-

-

9,450.27

1,424.27

-

519.24

14,060.94

Forests (hectares)

-

2,971.91

-

-

6,322.17

210.70

-

222.32

9527.10

Incunabula (pre-1501 Printed Works)

-

224

-

-

-

-

-

-

224

Oil Paintings

-

38

-

-

-

-

-

-

38

Pictures

-

2

-

-

-

-

-

-

2

Engravings

-

213

-

-

-

-

-

-

213


Number of Properties Returned on Paper to the
Ethnic Hungarian Community and the
Four Historic Hungarian Churches
in Romania

DENOMINATION
By Government Decree
By Decision of Special Committee at Meeting Held on:
Total
June 18, 2003
June 27, 2003
Sept. 9, 2003
Oct. 21, 2003
Nov. 18, 2003
Dec. 11, 2003
Jan. 23, 2004
Communal Properties  3  -  -  -  -  -  3
Roman Catholic Archdiocese Alba Iulia/Gyulafehérvár 18  7 13  -  1  6  7  55
Roman Catholic Diocese of Timisoara/Temesvár 2  4  -  9  -  -  2  17
Roman Catholic Diocese of Oradea/Nagyvárad  6  6  5  -  -  -  5 22
Roman Catholic Diocese of Satu Mare/Szatmárnémeti  2  -  -  -  -  8
Total Roman Catholic:  28 13   12  13  9  1  20 102
Evangelical-Lutheran Church  2  -  -  -  -  3  11
Hungarian Reformed District of Transylvania  7  2  6  4 12   5  9  9  54
Hungarian Reformed District of Királyhágómellék  4  3  1  2  3  22  43
Total Hungarian
Reformed:
 11  5  6  16  9  12  31  97
Unitarian Church  2  4  -  2 14
Total  46  22  27 22 25  10  23  52  227


Attachment No. 7.

February 2, 2004

Status Report

On Thirteen Requirements for Progress by the Romanian Government
on Restitution of Hungarian Church Properties
and Implementation of Law 501/2002


More than 1 1/2 years have passed June 25, 2002, when the Romanian Parliament adopted a law and implementing provisions on restitution of properties illegally confiscated from religious denominations under communism in the period 1945-1989. Having continuously monitored this issue for the past 13 years, and consulting regularly with the affected four historic Hungarian churches themselves, the Hungarian Human Rights Foundation issued three reports in 2003 (January 15, April 9 and September 8) on the implementation of property restitution. We initially identified a minimum of thirteen measures which need to be taken by the Romanian government for the restitution process to begin.

Below we review the status of these requirements in light of the one-year functioning of the Special Committee established by the law's implementing provisions to assess the claims submitted by Churches.

Requirement 1: Amend the law to reduce the maximum five-year non-occupancy period to one year in the case of buildings currently occupied by public institutions.

Status: Not done, still necessary.

Requirement 2: The Romanian government must give assurances or make provisions to ensure that Special Committee decisions in favor of the claimants are binding decisions which cannot be challenged or overruled by current occupants and/or owners, including the state.

Status: Not done, still necessary.

Requirement 3: The deadline for submitting claims should be extended beyond March 2, 2003 upon consultation with the affected Churches.

Status: This was not done. HHRF previously reported, and the Special Committee has subsequently acknowledged, that the Churches faced difficulties in obtaining the documentation set forth in the Implementing Provisions to justify their claims. Of more immediate concern is newer, related Requirement 5.

Requirement 4: Eliminate the requirement to obtain "updated” title deeds and "legal status certificates” for claims submitted by the Churches by the March 2, 2003 deadline.

Status: Not done, still necessary. As we previously reported, the Special Committee deemed 90 percent of the claims submitted by all the Churches "incomplete” and is demanding "updated” title deeds for all claims submitted in 2002, as well as "legal status certificates” from the local authorities in all 7,568 cases! Since the Special Committee is aware that (1) it does not have the power to constrain local authorities to comply and (2) in the overwhelming majority of Hungarian cases, the local authorities have a vested interested in not providing any documentation since they stand to be disadvantaged by the return of property currently in their possession, it has not imposed deadlines for obtaining these documents.

Requirement 5: The workload and pace of the Special Committee should be reviewed and any necessary adjustments made as soon as possible to ensure that it meets the 60-day deadline. The U.S. government should encourage the Romanian authorities not to deny any claims.

Status: Not done. In not one case did the Special Committee meet the 60-day deadline from date of submission for ruling on each individual case. To date, after a six-month delay, it has ruled on a total of 277 cases out of 7,568 on six occasions. A member of the Special Committee has indicated that the administrative staff will be increased to eight beginning February 2004, but even so, at its current pace, it will take the committee a minimum of seven years to merely process the submitted claims.

Requirement 6: A confidence-building measure would be to institute bi-weekly briefings between the Special Committee and representatives from the historic Hungarian churches, NGOs and the Democratic Alliance of Hungarians in Romania, with the possible inclusion of Ambassador Michael Guest, to discuss progress and tackle issues. The adversarial relationship created between the Churches and the Special Committee by the Law and the Implementing Provisions would thereby be mitigated.

Status: In progress. The Special Committee and representatives from the historic Hungarian churches, NGOs and the Democratic Alliance of Hungarians in Romania are ready to have their first meeting in this respect. Participation of U.S. State Department is considered most important by each party.

Requirement 7: Amend the Law and establish an equitable formula for compensating the churches for demolished properties.

Status: Not done, still necessary, especially in light of the fact that apparently many claims submitted were for such properties and will therefore be rejected.

Requirement 8: Amend the Law and Implementing Provisions to specify who evaluates the state of properties at the end of the probable five-year occupancy period in cases of occupation by public institutions, thereby preventing future misunderstandings.

Status: Not done, still necessary. According to DAHR Parliamentarian László Borbély, the Romanian Cabinet will debate such a legal provision at its first meeting in 2004.

Requirement 9: Refund property taxes to those churches which had to pay taxes on properties they had not regained full occupancy of.

Status: Not done, still necessary.

Requirement 10: Amend the Law to specifically exclude the practice of requiring monetary compensation from the Churches to cover state costs for maintenance and improvement of the buildings since their confiscation in the late 1940's.

Status: Not done, still necessary.

Requirement 11: Enact the law on the restitution of confiscated minority community properties and involve the Hungarian minority in the drafting process and implementation.

Status: Not done, still necessary. A draft bill, modifying former government decree No. 83/1999, was submitted to Parliament and a reconciled version adopted by both houses. Its content, which is apparently similar to the Law No. 501/2002 on church property restitution, is yet to be made public. The earliest timeframe for finalization of the community property law will be the Spring session of Parliament, therefore, at best one year after the deadline of March 31, 2003 stipulated in the 2003 Cooperation Agreement between the ruling PSD and the Democratic Alliance of Hungarian in Romania. The draft was not submitted to a broader debate by the country's various minority communities.

Requirement 12: Implement laws on restoring to their rightful owners ecclesiastical objects, baptismal records and church archives seized by communist authorities.

Status: Partial implementation of Law 182/2000 in progress regarding the return of ecclesiastical objects to their rightful owners. DAHR Parliamentarians have submitted a draft on returning church archives seized by communist authorities, but it languishes in committee.

Requirement 13: As requested by the historic Hungarian churches from Prime Minister Adrian Nastase in May 2002, guarantee in legislation the immediate and unqualified return of ten percent of the total properties confiscated, to counterbalance the inevitable delays which will occur in implementing full restitution.

Status: Not done. Delays, as predicted have already occurred and will necessarily continue unless dramatic legal and procedural changes are immediately implemented. Since the latter is highly unlikely, a return of the symbolic ten percent is timelier than ever.